Posts Tagged ‘Cheap property Spain’
What’s on in the Murcia region?
If you live in Spain or are coming to Spain you may find this site of great use, it gives lots of information on a weekly news letter and tells you what is on and where in the Murcia region. You can subscribe to the weekly newsletter, it is FREE and gives much more information about places of interest, museums, ferias, fiestas, shows, concerts, entertainment and where to eat and drink . You can advertise or list goods for sale.There is something new to be learnt every week. Great ideas to get the best out the region.
Go to:- http://www.simplynetworking.es/index.php
Admin: 03 September 2010
Paying Tax in Spain – Exploding the Myths
Many British expatriates arrive in Spain to live without fully understanding the local tax situation or any obligations that may remain to the UK taxman. There are quite a few myths around and unless you are properly informed you may get your tax planning wrong. This article looks at some of the common misconceptions and separates fact from fiction.
I am resident in Spain but complete a full tax return in the UK
► You become resident for tax purposes in Spain if:
- you spend more than 183 days in one calendar year in Spain (the days do not have to be consecutive), or
- your “centre of economic interests” is in Spain, or
- your “centre of vital interests” is in Spain, or
- your spouse is resident in Spain unless you can prove you are resident in another country.
► As a resident of Spain you are liable for income and capital gains taxes on your worldwide income.
► If you receive a gift or inheritance as a Spanish resident, you may be liable to Spanish succession tax.
► You must complete a Spanish tax return in respect of your worldwide income.
► A UK tax return only needs to be completed in respect of certain non-exempt income, such as rental income from UK property.
I am taxed at source on my UK assets and therefore I am not liable to tax in Spain on these assets
► You are entitled to double tax relief if you have income subject to tax at source in the UK which is also taxed in Spain.
► You can usually make arrangements for tax not to be deducted at source in the UK on certain types of income. This income would then be received gross and taxed solely in Spain.
I am taxed at source on my offshore bank accounts under the EU Savings Tax Directive and therefore am not liable to tax in Spain
► Paying withholding tax on offshore interest payments does not mean that you have no further tax liabilities on the same income in Spain.
► You still must declare such earnings on your Spanish tax return.
► If you pay the withholding tax and declare the income in Spain you are unlikely to receive any tax credit in Spain and could pay tax twice.
I can withdraw 5% of my UK/offshore insurance bond per year for 20 years without any liability to Spanish tax
► The 5% rule only applies to UK residents.
► As a Spanish tax resident, your offshore insurance bond will be taxed according to the Spanish rules.
There is no tax to pay if I have not taken withdrawals from my insurance bond
► The taxation of insurance bonds in Spain depends on whether the bond is ‘qualifying’ (issued by an EU country and compliant with Spanish regulations) or ‘non-qualifying’.
► Non-qualifying bonds are valued at 31st December each year and any increase in value from 1st January is taxed in full as income, even if there has been no withdrawal. The taxable income is taxed as savings income, so at 19% on the first €6,000 and 21% on any balance. For example, if an investment bond increases in value by 10% from €200,000 to €220,000 in any one year, the tax payable in Spain is €4,080 (€6,000 x19% = €1,140, + €14,000 × 21% = €2,940).
► Any fund located in a ‘tax haven’ (eg Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey) is non-qualifying and will receive this unfavourable tax treatment.
A withdrawal from a qualifying offshore bond will be taxed at 19% on the first €6,000 and 21% on any balance
► There is no tax to pay until a withdrawal is made from qualifying bonds in Spain.
► The taxation is very favourable because only the growth in value element is taxed, not the whole withdrawal. Using the above example, if you withdraw €20,000 you will only need to pay tax on roughly 10% of it. The taxable income is therefore €2,000 and your tax liability (at 19%) is only €380.
UK investment bonds are tax free in the UK for Spanish residents
► A UK investment bond is taxed at source in the UK.
► The tax deducted can be set against your tax liability in Spain, so you do not pay tax twice on the same income.
► If you have either a non-qualifying insurance bond or a UK investment bond it will be advantageous to transfer it to a qualifying, non-UK, bond.
I am a UK national and not liable to Spanish succession tax (SST)
► SST is payable if the inheritor or recipient of a gift is resident in Spain, or the asset being gifted or passed on death is situated in Spain.
► The tax rate can be as high as 34% for inheritances or gifts within the immediate family or higher for more distantly related recipients.
► Depending on which region you live in, there are usually deductions available according to the closeness in relationship between the recipient and the deceased, and other exemptions may be available.
► SST can often be avoided through use of an offshore trust.
Contact an experienced international tax and wealth management adviser like Blevins Franks for advice on tax mitigation strategies in Spain.
Note that the tax treatment(s) detailed above are current at the time of writing and may change in the future.
By Bill Blevins, Managing Director, Blevins Franks
Data Disappointments For Sterling
Wider UK trade deficit and falling factory gate prices dampen appetite for the pound. Stability returns to the euro as the Greek panic subsides.
Sterling spent a second week paying the bill for its post-budget honeymoon. It has now returned all the way to its position before the chancellor stood up to deliver his speech on 22 June. There was nothing dramatic about the decline and no sense of the panic that would have been typical six months or more ago. To some extent the fall was a completion of the technical head-and-shoulders formation that peaked a fortnight ago.
The UK economic data were mixed. Monday’s services sector purchasing managers’ index (PMI) fell by one point to a less-than expected 54.4. It suggested that companies were still growing their activity but at a progressively slower pace. Wednesday’s production figures were good in parts. Although manufacturing production grew by only 0.3% in May instead of the +0.5% analysts had predicted, it was a far better result than April’s -0.8% decline. The broader industrial production figure, which includes such things as mining and energy, reversed the previous month’s decline with a +0.7% rise. The Halifax house price index went down for a second month, this time by -0.6%, leaving house prices 6.3% higher than a year earlier.
The most disappointing data, at least as far as sterling was concerned, came on Friday with June’s producer price index (PPI) and the balance of trade for May. The input and output components of the PPI, representing manufacturers’ costs and factory gate prices, were lower in June by -0.2% and -0.3% respectively. The numbers supported the Bank of England’s projection that inflation will fall back towards its 2% target without the need for higher interest rates. The UK trade figures were also unhelpful. The deficit in goods widened to more than £8 billion while goods and services together registered a £4.5 billion shortfall. Both deficits were bigger than expected and cast renewed doubt on the alleged benefits of a weak pound.
Other events during the week saw an announcement from the new Office for Budgetary Responsibility (OBR) that its boss, Alan Budd, did not intend to renew his initial three month contract and that the two other members of the triumvirate would also be leaving before the end of the year. Critics of the new setup wondered why he was leaving. Could it be because of lack of independence? Perhaps not, for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) came out later in the week with economic growth projections remarkably similar to those put together by the OBR. The IMF agrees with the OBR that Britain’s gross domestic product will grow by 1.2%. Its forecast of 2.1% growth in 2011 is lower than the OBR’s 2.3% prediction.
After months of punishment as a result of the problems in Greece the euro has made a good fist of regaining some semblance of stability. There has been a correction to what commentators retrospectively describe as an ‘oversold’ condition, in much the same way that sterling recovered from its near-parity lows a year and a half ago.
The euro zone’s services PMI came in better than its British or US equivalents at 55.5, minutely higher than the previous month. Retail sales also performed better than forecast in June, rising by +0.3% instead of falling by that amount as analysts had predicted. Finalised figures for economic expansion in the first quarter of the year showed a +0.2% growth in gross domestic product (GDP), probably a tad short of the +0.3% growth that is expected to have demonstrated. Germany performed better than Britain on the industrial production front, with growth of +2.6% in May, while it demonstrated slower inflation at +0.8% in the year to June. If the Bank of England is under no pressure to raise interest rates in the War on Inflation, the European Central Bank (ECB) seems to be under no greater pressure.
Indeed, the ECB sided with the Bank of England in leaving its policy interest rate unchanged at Thursday’s meeting. President Jean-Claude Trichet expressed guarded optimism at the pace of economic growth but found no difficulty in containing his enthusiasm. Of more interest to investors was that he did not say about the ’stress tests’ that Euroland banks have recently undergone. The purpose of the tests is to examine how those banks would survive another serious economic or financial shock. Investors are uneasy that the ’stresses’ to which the banks’ balance sheets are subjected might not in fact be real life worst-case situations. The results of the tests will come out in a couple of weeks’ time and are eagerly awaited.
That sterling spent the whole week on the slide does not bode well for it in the immediate future. With UK statistics for Gross domestic product, inflation, consumer confidence, employment and earnings all due this week there is scope for further setbacks if the numbers are not supportive.
Buyers of the euro should hedge half their requirement until sterling’s future course becomes clearer.
Credit:- Moneycorp 13 July 2010
Britons missing out on £101M each year on international money transfers
Poor bank rates and high charges for foreign exchange transactions mean individuals need to be savvier when transferring money overseas. Research by Moneycorp reveals that Brits are potentially losing over £101m a year by not shopping around for the best deals when transferring money abroad. Furthermore, uncompetitive exchange rates and high bank charges are costing individuals a lot of money, despite a concerted effort by most to reduce their outgoings on luxury and even staple items.
David Kerns, Head of Personal Clients at Moneycorp, comments:
“While many individuals are visiting comparison websites more frequently, checking voucher code sites and consulting online consumer forums before purchasing goods in order to save money, this mindset doesn’t seem to have extended to foreign exchange. As a result, individuals are missing out on a very large sum of money they could be saving, by transferring funds overseas through a foreign exchange specialist rather than a bank. Not surprisingly, high street banks are cashing in as a result of this surprisingly apathetic approach.”
People buying or selling property overseas and people emigrating or repatriating will be particularly affected, though this issue will affect all Brits who are transferring money overseas.
People who own additional properties abroad and make regular mortgage and/or utilities payments will also be badly affected, as every transfer is open to individual transfer charges, in addition to exchange rates.
Data from the UK’s number one property website, Rightmove Overseas, reveals that the average house price in the Costa del Sol in Spain is currently €369,860.68. With a deposit of 10% (€36,986), using a high street bank rather than Moneycorp would cost an individual, on average, an extra £558 on their deposit alone.
An individual who wants to transfer a lump sum of £100,000 to an account in Europe would lose out on an average of €1,690 by using their bank for the transfer into euros.
David Kerns concludes: “Despite the UK coming out of recession recently, individuals shouldn’t be lining the pockets of their bank managers and it’s in their best interest to maximise their investments. Prior to making any overseas payments, we always advocate that people shop around to get the best rates possible.”
Credit: Moneycorp – commercial foreign exchange – www.moneycorp.com
Note:- Follow our link for more information: -
http://www.moneycorp.com/affiliates/microsite/index.cfm?agentid=10082123
The Bank de España wants to reduce banks’ property portfolios.
The Banco de España (bde) has asked a large number of banks to undertake an impact test for their residential properties and other real estate assets in order to draw up a new strategy, based on provisions whose purpose is to ensure banks and savings banks sell their residential real estate as soon as possible.
The regulator is in favour of banks offloading their residential properties as soon as possible, and is considering increasing the pressure by raising the minimum amount banks and savings banks must hold in provisions for property assets. In contrast, it could ease the rest of the provisions, such as default ones.
For some time now the idea that the Banco de España may raise the minimum required provision to 30% of a property’s value, if it has been held by the bank for over two years, has been circulating in the market. This is something that some banks already do, but the Banco de España has sent the test s in order to decide whether or not to make the provision obligatory. The bank is also considering raising the provisions for longer-term and/or problematic assets to over 30%. At the present time banks must set aside 10% of a property’s value during the first year it is on the bank’s books and 20% in the second year.
The final objective of all the measures is to penalise the banks which have real estate on their books to encourage them to sell the properties, as this is one of the issues that generates the most distrust and lack of confidence in the banks´ soundness. According to bank data, the financial sector has 165,000 million euros in problematic real estate assets, of which around 60,000 million are for repossessed real estate or land.
Credit: Fuster & Associates
Note: If this is the case, then will we see the banks doing more to avoid repossession of properties or will the banks start accepting much lower offers on properties, in order to reduce their substantial portfolios? Either will do, the former, if you are a home owner under pressure or the latter for an investor. However, even with the multitude of properties available, why is it that first time buyers still cannot get a foot on the ladder? Perhaps the government in co-operation with the banks should be looking at that sector to move the property market along.
Government cuts Notary fees, making it fractionally cheaper to buy a home in Spain.
The government has announced a 5% reduction in notary and registry fees on property deeds as part of a package of measures to reduce the deficit and stimulate the economy.
Notaries and Registrars are screaming blue murder at this attack on their earnings; whilst house buyers will hardly notice the difference the savings are so small.
How big a saving will that 5% reduction in notary and registry fees give the average home buyer in Spain? It will be between €35 for a property costing €150,000 and €45 for a home costing €300,000, according to calculations done by Idealista.es, a Spanish property portal. Almost insignificant then.
Notaries and registrars are furious. The latter’s’ fees are already down by 50% thanks to the slump in property transactions.
Credit: Mark Stucklin
www.spanishpropertyinsight.com
Note: From a buyers point of view they are unsympathetic but in order to assist in the clearance of the back log of property, the consensus is why increase property tax from 7% to 8% on 1st July, when in fact it would be better to scrap it and look elsewhere for savings!
The Spanish property Market is at an Impasse, says an expert.
What does the immediate future hold for the Spanish property market? Stagnation or another lurch downwards, according to one industry leader.
“The property market is under observation. Either we have touched bottom, or we are going to fall again.” That was Juan Fernández-Aceytuno, Managing Director of Sociedad de Tasación, one of Spain’s leading appraisal companies, speaking at the launch of stvalora.com, a new online valuation service.
Almost 4 years since property prices peaked, the market is still stuck in what some call a correction. “We are at an impasse, with everyone waiting to see what happens to the market. Few people will dare to say if we have touched bottom or just a bottle neck before falling again,” said Fernández-Aceytuno.
No rebound in property prices.
A rebound in prices is the one thing that Fernández-Aceytuno confidently rules out, despite the forthcoming increase in VAT that will put up the price of new homes. If anything he is more worried about a potential increase in interest rates forcing house prices down further.
Fernández-Aceytuno also points out that house prices tend to rise in good times and fall in the bad.
“Nobody has a crystal ball when it comes to prices, but at times when disposable incomes and credit have risen, prices have risen, and conversely, when these have fallen, so have prices.” In Spain today incomes are falling, there are more than 4 million unemployed, credit is scarce, and there is no sign of the situation improving anytime soon.
The Spanish property market recovery, when it comes, will be lead by a change of attitude in the sector, argues the boss of Sociedad de Tasación. “What the sector really needs is to regain trust and credibility,” he said, whilst admitting that some companies inflated valuations for mortgages by 15-20% during the boom. With prices down around 20%, that leaves some borrowers sitting on losses of 40%. “That’s what I would call suffering a bubble.”
Credit:- Posted on May 21, 2010 by Mark Stucklin
Property Market
Mortgage floor: 29% of mortgages have a minimum interest rate.
29% of mortgages taken out by Spanish families to finance the purchase of their home are subject to a mortgage “floor”, which means that when interest rates fall to a certain level, usually to below 3.1%, they do not benefit, according to a study drawn up by the Banco de España at the request of the Senate.
The Banco de España recognises that financial institutions use theses clauses to recover “the minimum costs generated by these products when interest rates change sharply”, and therefore it believes that “they are a factor which promotes financial stability, something which is in the public interest”. For this reason it affirms that “as long as the clauses are written in a clear, understandable way, they must be considered to be freely agreed upon by the parties” and “it would not be appropriate to classify them as unfair.”
The study found that 13 of the 49 banks which took part in the study systematically include this type of clause in their mortgages. Of these, 4 do not include a mortgage “ceiling” to protect clients against interest rate increases. Furthermore, the others admit that “in the majority of cases they do not provide individuals with effective protection against the risk of a rise in interest rates, as the mortgage ceilings are very high.”
Credit:- www.spainsolicitors.com
Fuster & Associates
Rise in Spanish IVA
From the 1st July, 2 of the 3 categories of Spanish VAT will rise.
16% to 18%
7% to 8%
4% (is to remain the same).
What does this mean for the Spanish Property market which is already struggling to survive the current climate?
It will certainly increase the cost of buying and selling property and obtaining a mortgage in an already crippled market.
What is the government thinking?
Of course it will generate income for them but may push the market further backwards and no doubt they are hoping that prices will fall still further and generate increased interest from buyers and steady the industry but at what cost? More likely it will force more builders, promoters and agencies out of business with knock on job losses. The banks will come under further pressure and there will be many owners caught in the trap of having mortgages far greater than the value of their property causing an increase in repossessions as people struggle with their own economic crisis, losing jobs and putting more people on the bread-line.
Then there is the knock on effect for furniture and electrical companies and many other suppliers with steady drops in sales already recorded.
Buyers and Investors
No doubt there are people watching the situation with interest and for the general buyer now is the time to buy a property before the IVA increases and with so many properties available at low prices.
For the investor, they will probably sit it out and wait for rock bottom distressed sales and then pounce as the drop in price will by far outweigh the increase in purchase costs.
With the pound rising against the euro, buying a property is looking even more attractive.
Mortgages
As the banks continue to come under pressure they will negotiate on distressed properties in order to clear their overflowing books and are currently making mortgage offers which pre crisis would be unheard of.
If you have the money now is the time to buy Spanish Property.
Admin: 5 May 2010
Spanish Capital Gains Tax Relief on the Main Home
Does It Apply On Overseas Properties?
The Spanish gains tax regulations can provide relief on the sale of the main home for Spanish tax residents whose property qualifies as their habitual main residence. If you are 65 years or older the gain is tax free even if you do not buy another property. If you are under 65, the exemption only applies if you reinvest the proceeds of sale into a new main residence within a four year period, starting from two years before the sale. There is some confusion about whether this relief applies if your new main home is located outside Spain, so this article looks into this issue.
How does the relief work?
For the property you are selling to qualify as your main home, you need to have lived in it for a continuous period of at least three years from the date the property was bought or construction was completed. If you have to sell earlier because of a change of job, marriage, separation or death of a partner, the tax relief can still apply.
The relief is based on the proportion of the total sales proceeds reinvested in the new home. If it costs more than the sale price of the old home, the full gain is exempt. If only half of the sale proceeds are reinvested, then only half of the gain is exempt and the other half is taxable in the year of sale.
If the property being sold has a mortgage on it, it is the net sale proceeds (after deducting the mortgage) which need to be fully reinvested to escape capital gains tax.
The taxpayer must declare the gain on his Spanish tax return together with his intention to reinvest the proceeds into a new main home, or the relief will not apply.
Location of the properties
While the tax relief is only available to Spanish tax residents (as the property cannot be your main home if you are not Spanish tax resident), the properties themselves do not need to be located in Spain – either the residence you are selling or the new one you are buying.
So, if you move to Spain and sell your main home in your former country of residence (eg the UK) after you become Spanish resident, you may be able to avoid Spanish capital gains tax under these provisions. You have to purchase your Spanish home within the two years preceding the date of sale of the UK property or within two years following the sale. The purchase price of the Spanish property should be at least the net sale proceeds of your UK property for full relief to apply.
If the Spanish property costs less than the amount you received from the sale of your UK property, you will be charged tax in Spain on a proportion of the gain equivalent to the sale proceeds not reinvested.
Similarly, if you sell your main home in Spain and move to another country, reinvestment relief can still apply to the former Spanish home even though the new home is not located in Spain, provided that you and your family make this property your new main home. The purchase of the new home must take place within the relevant time limits and the full sale proceeds must be reinvested for full relief to apply. If the family members move overseas to the new home, but the taxpayer remains in Spain, the relief will not apply as the property has not become the taxpayer’s new main home.
An example of relief applying in such a case is given in a formal response to a query submitted to the Spanish tax administration.
Furthermore, it would be a clear breach of EU law if Spain did not allow the relief for reinvestment in a new home situated within another EU country. This situation arose in Portugal, and so the European Commission took action, as below:
“In July 2004 the European Commission invited Portugal to change its rules which prohibit the capital gains tax relief where the new main home is situated outside Portugal. The European Commission considers these rules to be discriminatory and contrary to the EC Treaty rules on the free movement of people, etc.
“Portugal did not amend its legislation within the 2 months time limit given by the Commission, so in January 2005 the Commission decided to refer Portugal to the European Court of Justice.
“On 26 October 2006, the European Court of Justice ruled that the restriction of the relief to the purchase of a primary residence located in only Portugal was an infringement of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EU Treaty.
“As a result of the European Court decision, taxpayers should be able to benefit from the main residence relief in Portugal, provided the proceeds are reinvested in another primary residence within the European Union.”
By David Franks, Chief Executive, Blevins Franks